skip to Main Content
VP and GM

Strategies for Leading Organizational Change Effectively

Managing an organizational change is certainly a challenging task. Organizational changes may be exceedingly complicated and have a reputation for not going as smoothly as expected. Leaders frequently fail to yield what they expect before commencing an organizational change process. According to this Harvard Business Review article, one of the main reasons for this is that executives frequently fail to explore how to approach change in a way that reflects their objectives. As a result, the article proposes a few effective approaches that executives may employ while leading an organizational change to avoid chaos and successfully direct the process.

The article starts by highlighting the four change approaches: directed change, self-assembly change, masterful change, and emergent change. According to the article, the four change approaches technique guides leaders through their options, assisting them in assessing what model they presently employ and deciding on the best strategy to adopt. However, according to the article, this frequently necessitates a shift in their leadership style and expertise. Each of the four change techniques is explained in detail further in the article. Directive change has been defined as a method in which top management makes all the choices that others must simply follow. The article defines self-assembly change as a technique in which top management defines the change direction but outsources execution to local management. Masterful change is further described as a change in which top management sets the direction and holds it consistently across the business, and leaders invest significant time and energy in high-quality interaction and communication with numerous stakeholders to develop it. Lastly, the article argues that emergent change is a strategy in which leaders have a guiding aim and a flexible direction, but just a few “hard rules” regulate the activities of people participating in the change. Finally, the article recommends a step-by-step strategy for directing an organizational change. According to the article, leaders should begin by identifying their change objective, which will help them better define all of the elements necessary for change, followed by efficiently employing change-approach frameworks and communicating their deliberate decisions with everyone involved.

Leading an organizational change is challenging not just because it is complicated but also because ineffective management might jeopardize the organization’s position. The aforementioned are a few successful techniques for dealing with an organizational change and important actions to consider when leading one.

Transition into highly sophisticated professionals within the domain of health care. Click to know more about the Global Health Care Leaders Program (GHLP) from Harvard Medical School Executive Education.

Back To Top