Skip to content
resource allocation

Important Types of Leadership Styles

The complex hierarchy in today’s corporations and the ever-changing demands of the marketplace demand leaders to be not only effective and strong-headed but also adaptive and open to change. As the decision-makers, they need to change and evolve their leadership styles to bring out the best in their team members and adhere to the organizational goals and deadlines. In this article, we will explore the important types of leadership styles that are important for executives to understand in a corporate setting and how executive education programs can help cultivate their own styles.

Important types of leadership styles

  • Autocratic leadership

Autocratic leadership involves a centralized decision-making process where the leader holds significant authority and control. This style is characterized by a strict chain of command, with little to no input from subordinates. This kind of leadership style is useful for projects with a tight deadline that need quick decision-making and clear directives.

Challenges: This leadership style can make individuals feel disengaged and undervalued. It can also lead to resistance toward the leader. The organization will lose out on the creative problem-solving solutions and innovative thinking abilities of the employees because of the strict set of instructions that they have to follow. Thus, for long-term organizational success, autocratic leaders need to strike a balance between maintaining control and fostering collaboration within their teams.

  • Democratic leadership

Democratic leadership emphasizes inclusivity and collaboration in decision-making. Democratic leaders encourage open communication and seek input from team members, fostering a sense of shared responsibility. While extensively utilized in various fields, this is one of the significant leadership styles in creative industries and departments such as marketing, media, and design, as it fosters creativity and enhances employee engagement.

Challenges: Since achieving consensus within a diverse team can be challenging, this leadership style can lead to time-consuming decision processes and potential conflicts among the team members. Thus, democratic leaders have to navigate through varying opinions effectively and strike a balance between seeking input and making timely decisions to maintain operational efficiency.

  • Transformational leadership

One of the most widely used leadership styles, transformational leadership focuses on inspiring and motivating team members to achieve their full potential. It can be employed by leaders who are visionaries and are aware of the strengths of their team members, with a clear line of expectations from each employee. This leadership style focuses on individual efforts along with the collective output of the team and can foster a robust organizational culture that supports continuous growth.

Challenges: Transformational leaders can have very high, often unrealistic, expectations from their team members, which can lead to potential employee burnout. It is thus not sustainable in the long term. Additionally, this leadership style has sustainability concerns since it depends a lot on the charisma of the leader to inspire the employees.

  • Transactional leadership

Transactional leadership is a task-oriented leadership style that relies on a system of rewards and punishments to motivate team members. This structured approach ensures clear expectations and accountability among the team members, with each member performing their best to achieve rewards like incentives, bonuses, and more. The consequences of not meeting the organizational instructions could be verbal reprimands, written warnings, demotions, etc.

Challenges: This leadership style can be criticized for its rigid nature and focus on short-term goals. It can create a very strict organizational structure, which can limit creativity among the employees. Furthermore, the importance placed on rewards or the fear-mongering of possible consequences can create unnecessary competition at the workplace and can also lead to a loss of intrinsic motivation toward individual duties among the team members.

  • Laissez-faire leadership

Laissez-faire (French for ‘let it be’) is a leadership style that adopts a hands-off approach, allowing team members autonomy and decision-making freedom. This is one of the leadership styles that can promote creativity and innovation among team members and motivate them to take initiative. Its successful implementation requires leaders to trust their team’s capabilities while maintaining a supportive presence when needed.

Challenges: Excessive use of the laissez-faire style of leadership can lead to potential chaos within the team. Some team members may feel a lack of guidance from their seniors. It might also lead to concerns about individual responsibility, necessitating a framework for accountability and a balance between freedom and the delivery of individual tasks.

  • Bureaucratic leadership

Bureaucratic leaders rely on established rules and procedures, maintaining a strict hierarchical structure within the organization. This leadership style emphasizes strict adherence to policies and internally set guidelines. In a chaotic situation like a change of leadership, shuffling of hierarchy, or addition of a new line of work, this proves to be one of the most reliable leadership styles as it ensures consistency and order among the tasks allocated, expectations from individual employees, and deadlines.

Challenges: Bureaucratic leadership can often prove to be inflexible, result in slow decision-making processes, and be a potential hindrance to innovation. Bureaucratic leaders must strike a balance between maintaining a structured environment and fostering adaptability to address evolving challenges in dynamic work environments.

  • Adaptive leadership

As opposed to the bureaucratic style of leadership, the adaptive leadership style thrives on flexibility to navigate change effectively. It encourages a dynamic approach, emphasizing learning and innovation. Adaptive leaders are quick to adjust strategies based on evolving circumstances, ensuring the organization remains resilient in the face of internal and external change.

Challenges: This leadership style demands continuous adjustment on the part of the employees. The constant change in strategies and expectations can lead to a loss of employee motivation, which can often resist the change.

Why understand leadership styles as an executive leader?

Executive leaders should have a strong understanding of different leadership styles because it enables them to adapt their approach to various situations and team dynamics in the corporate sector. By being versatile in their leadership style, they can effectively motivate and guide their teams, foster collaboration, and drive organizational success. For example:

  1. Transformational leadership – This style inspires and motivates employees through a shared vision and values. Executives who embrace transformational leadership can create a culture of innovation and continuous improvement.
  2. Transactional leadership – This approach emphasizes clear expectations, rewards, and consequences. It can be valuable in situations where precise processes and compliance are crucial.
  3. Servant leadership – Executives who practice servant leadership prioritize the well-being of their team members. This fosters trust, loyalty, and a positive work environment.
  4. Autocratic leadership – While not always recommended, there are times when quick, decisive action is needed. Understanding autocratic leadership can help executives make tough decisions when required.
  5. Democratic leadership – Involving team members in decision-making can lead to better buy-in and innovative ideas. Executives who employ this style can benefit from collective wisdom.
  6. Laissez-faire leadership – Allowing team members significant autonomy can be effective when dealing with self-motivated and skilled professionals.
  7. Situational leadership – This approach involves adapting leadership styles based on the specific situation or individual. Executives who understand situational leadership can tailor their leadership to the needs of their teams.

By comprehending these leadership styles, executive leaders can assess the needs of their organization, teams, and goals more effectively. This adaptability ultimately makes them more versatile and influential leaders in the corporate sector.

Executive education programs to develop individual leadership styles

Executive education plays a vital role in helping individuals cultivate and refine their leadership styles in the following ways:

  • Exposure to diverse leadership styles – These programs expose participants to a wide range of leadership theories and styles. By learning about various approaches, individuals can broaden their perspectives and adopt elements from different styles that resonate with them.
  • Self-assessment – Executive education programs often include personality assessments and 360-degree feedback to help participants gain insights into their natural leadership tendencies. Understanding one’s strengths and weaknesses is the first step in developing a leadership style.
  • Peer learning – Interacting with peers and colleagues from diverse backgrounds during executive education provides an opportunity to observe and learn from different leadership styles. Peer discussions and case studies allow participants to share their experiences and gain new insights.
  • Leadership coaching – Many executive education programs offer personalized leadership coaching. Coaches help individuals identify their unique leadership style, set goals for improvement, and provide guidance and feedback throughout the learning process.
  • Skill development – Participants in executive education programs often receive training in specific leadership competencies, such as communication, conflict resolution, and decision-making. These skills can be integrated into an individual’s leadership style.
  • Practical application – Executive education typically includes real-world projects or simulations that allow participants to practice and refine their leadership styles in a safe and controlled environment. This hands-on experience is invaluable for skill development.
  • Feedback and reflection – Regular feedback sessions and self-reflection exercises encourage participants to assess their leadership style’s effectiveness. This ongoing assessment helps individuals make continuous improvements.
  • Networking opportunities – Building a professional network during executive education programs provides access to mentors and role models who can offer guidance on leadership style development.
  • Access to thought leaders – Many executive education programs feature guest speakers and thought leaders who share their experiences and insights into leadership. Exposure to these experts can inspire individuals to adapt and evolve their styles.

In summary, executive education offers a structured and supportive environment for individuals to explore, refine, and adapt their leadership styles. Through self-assessment, exposure to diverse styles, coaching, skill development, and practical application, participants can develop a leadership style that aligns with their values, strengths, and the needs of their organizations.

Executive education programs

MIT Professional Education – Technology Leadership Program (TLP)

The MIT Professional Education Technology Leadership Program (TLP) is a multi-modular program delivered by MIT faculty on campus, live virtually, and geared towards the development needs of the next generation of technology CEOs, CTOs, CIOs, and emerging leaders. Global technology leaders and practitioners learn to lead transformational growth by developing an understanding of exponential and digital technologies and innovations and the methods and mechanisms to apply best practices within their organizations, sectors, and industries. This program is tailored for technology executives and leaders. It provides insights into the intersection of technology, innovation, and leadership.

MIT Professional Education | Technology Leadership Program

HMS Global Healthcare Leaders Program (GHLP)

The Global Health Care Leaders Program (GHLP) from Harvard Medical School Executive Education is a first-of-its-kind, multi-modular global program that aims to bring together the most important topics defining the future of health care for the leaders who will lead the charge. Faculty from Harvard Medical School, as well as other leading industry experts, will provide insights to enable participants to craft ambitious solutions and shape health care globally. For professionals in the healthcare sector, the HMS Global Healthcare Leaders Program offers a comprehensive curriculum that addresses the unique challenges of healthcare leadership.

NUS Global HR Leaders Program (HRLP)

This 6-month program is an immersive experience that focuses on leading-edge human resources transformation that is creating a paradigm shift enabling industries to leapfrog challenges. The NUS Business School faculty, alongside leading industry experts, will provide rich insights so that you can craft ambitious solutions and shape the future of HR within your organization and industry. You will achieve all this as you take on increasing responsibilities within your organization and move towards the C-suite, while building an enviable network of peers, colleagues, industry leaders, and faculty from NUS who are global thought leaders.

Conclusion

In conclusion, leadership in the corporate sector demands flexibility and the ability to tailor one’s approach to the situation at hand. Understanding different leadership styles and participating in executive education programs are essential steps for executives looking to excel in their roles and drive organizational success. By honing their leadership skills, executives can become versatile leaders capable of navigating the complexities of today’s corporate world.

A leadership style is how a leader provides direction, motivates, and guides a team or organization, reflecting their approach to decision-making, communication, and overall leadership.

There is no style considered a universally “most important” leadership style, as its effectiveness depends on the context and long- and short-term goals. However, adaptive leadership, which allows leaders to adjust their style based on situations, is often considered crucial for organizational success.

The three main types of leadership are autocratic, democratic, and adaptive. Autocratic leaders make decisions independently, democratic leaders involve the team, and adaptive leaders adjust their style based on situations.

Back To Top