skip to Main Content
Randomized Experiments

Improving Randomized Experiments

Scientific research relies on randomized experiments. But random testing can also be inaccurate if the subjects are influenced by each other’s responses. A condition known as interference.

Research by Chicago Booth principal researcher David Puelz, Booth’s Panos Toulis, Stanford’s Guillaume Basse, and University of California at Berkeley’s Avi Feller demonstrates a graph-based method that can help experimenters incorporate interference into their causal analyses. Considering the interference and then testing can make these randomized experiments far more valuable.

Become a global executive with University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Click to know more about the Chicago Booth Accelerated Development Program (Chicago Booth ADP).

Back To Top