“Leading Through” or “Power Over” – Choosing a Leadership Style
There are many approaches to leadership, each offering distinct advantages depending on the situation and organizational goals. Some leaders emphasize control and authority, focusing on maintaining order and driving results through a top-down “power over” model. This method can be effective in certain high-pressure environments, but it often overlooks the human element. In contrast, the “leading through” approach prioritizes collaboration, empathy, and empowerment, recognizing that people are at the heart of success. This approach encourages leaders to inspire and guide, rather than control. Ultimately, those who lead through relationships, understanding, and shared purpose are more successful in creating a motivated, loyal, and productive team. Hence, this Harvard Business Review article emphasizes whether the “leading through” leadership approach is better than the “power over” strategy or not.
According to the article, organizations must shift from a “power over” leadership model to a “leading through” approach to enhance productivity and engagement. The article suggests that “leading through” prioritizes empathy, humanity, and collaboration, contrasting with traditional power structures that focus on control. According to the article, this shift helps organizations thrive by creating environments where people and purpose come first. The article suggests that adopting empathy-driven strategies, like the Cleveland Clinic’s transformation, can lead to improved performance, satisfaction, and innovation. The article emphasizes that effective leaders foster relationships of trust and care, which energize employees and inspire growth. Moreover, the article suggests that leaders should balance empathy with strategic action to drive change and solve complex problems. Leading through, according to the article, integrates the heart, mind, and soul of leadership to unlock potential, achieve long-term success, and create a more meaningful workplace.
Leaders who truly connect with their teams and emphasize the human aspect of leadership are often the most effective, fostering a culture of trust and engagement that drives long-term success. The preceding text highlights the stark differences between the “power over” and “leading through” leadership approaches and compares which is better.